|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
2
   |
Posted - 2012.03.23 17:52:00 -
[1] - Quote
Gunpoint Diplomacy, they're just these guys (and girl) you know.
The Tuskers and Bastards are pretty damn good too.
RIFT4... What can I say, balls (they too have a girl in corp so I imagine ovaries too) to the wall small ship piracy and don't afraid of anything. |
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 19:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kmelx wrote:
I'm not sure that permacamping the Crielere/Rancer gate, ganking noobs, with neutral scouts out in every direction so you can run away from any sign of an organised fleet counts as PVP. It certainly doesn't win you much in the way of respect.
The question though is who is the best lowsec 'PIRATE' corp and alliances, not best PvP.
I know you guys might be too busy making up killmails to have noticed this in the OP
The Rancer gate has been a pirate haven since forever, the fact that Pirates won't fight organised fleets, instead taking their loot and secreting it away is actually quite commendable. As such, The United are a Pirate corp and good at what they do, just because you don't like it doesn't mean they are any less so.
Quote:They seemed light on ECM to me
Irony much?
|
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.26 19:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Also, I now feel dirty for defending The United. |
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.27 18:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kmelx wrote:Kane Rizzel wrote:Also, I now feel dirty for defending The United. So you should - my point remains they are crap. Most people join low sec pirate corps for the pew. Negative Ten are a lowsec pirate alliance that gate camp one particular gate and prefer to run and hide rather than pew, you know they are lame and so do I. By no possible measure can ganking noobs and the idiots that decide to travel that particular shortcut through lowsec then running away from anyone who brings a fight qualify them as the "best" lowsec pirate corp or alliance  On the other comments you made earlier, sure most COA fleets or gangs run with some ECM, usually a solo falcon or blackbird for a 20 man fleet, but even we, the terrible blobbers that we are would be ashamed to run a 20 man fleet with four rooks.
Who are you to judge what makes a good Pirate? If you want to just PvP go fight R&K, PODLA, Club Bear, Genos etc.
But you don't want a fight, do you? None of the so called COA do, they want easy ganks which The United don't give you and which tbh, makes you that which you seem to so despise.
Then when you get a fight, having EM FC's, you make up killmails to make your side look good but forget to post all your lossmails.
Piracy is different for a lot of people in EVE, there is no one true way to be a Pirate, after all, we are free to do as we want, but saying that Piracy must result in a lossmail, well, get real mate, I make more ISK from ransoming than from a killmail of a noob who got lost on the way to Jita/Rens/wherever the **** else, or just wanted to see what this lowsec lark was all about.
|
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 09:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
The COA and The Fendahlian Collective aren't exactly a PvP powerhouse so you judging PvP prowess is a joke of the highest order, maybe you should just shut up and go back to making up killmails and get your joke coalition to post all your lossmails.
I'm not pretending The United are any good, I just believe you are so bad that your opinion means nothing.
By the way, as Anti Pirates, how do you justify flying with Pirates? |
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 12:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
Kmelx wrote:That's the thing though Kane I'm saying they are bad, your saying that their actions in running away from fights are "commendable"
Never said they were commendable, just that their definition of 'Pirate' is spot on, again, read the title of the ******* thread, it didn't ask for 'best lowsec pvp corp or alliance' You don't fit into that category either. Dial up your reading comprehension.
You're attacking an alliance for doing exactly what you do when a force that outguns you turns up, turn tail and run, get off your high horse, your hypocrisy makes the joke that is the COA even more ridiculous.
You really do have a bug up your ass about The United, which clearly shows they're doing something right 
Edit: Let's look at some numbers shall we
The United have a 48:1 success ratio with over 8 trillion ISK damage
Applied Creations has a 2:1 success ratio with 206 billion ISK damage
I know of one man corps with better ratios and damage done than Applied Creations, which again, makes your opinion on PvP null and void |
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 14:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kmelx wrote:
Given that I've been playing for less time than you have, on eve kill my ISK amount killed is higher than yours, I've lost fewer ships, lost less ships in ISK and have a lower chance of enemy survival and higher ISK efficiency than you I say that your points are all crap and you have no right to an opinion on lowsec piracy.
LOL, now you've just gone full ******. |
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 14:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Wensley wrote:Kane Rizzel wrote:makes your opinion on PvP null and void There's more to life than blasters, man.
<3
|
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.28 15:28:00 -
[9] - Quote
Hahaha |
Kane Rizzel
NovaKane Incorporated
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.06 18:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
You are correct, m0o were in fact gatecampers. Still Pirates and good at it.
mama guru wrote:
As for currently: piracy is as good as dead so the question is kinda irrelevant.
No, it is you who are irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|